I love this from a book review of Strategy: a History (Lawrence Freedman) in the Financial Times by Janan Ganesh on November 16, 2013:
"A serious strategy shows humility; it has built-in contingencies, never plans too far ahead, goes easy on details that cannot be controlled and does not pretend miracles can be achieved with a weak starting position. This emphases on looseness raises the problem of paradox: is Freedman's idea of a good strategy really a strategy at all? It is not more like a disposition or habit of mind, general resourcefulness and opportunism?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.