The government's top priority is to find out whether equipping vehicles with the ability to signal to each other automatically will help reduce collisions (35,000 deaths annually). For example, when one car brakes and the car behind doesn't slow. A V2V system could also warn a motorist stopped at an intersection when another car was heading through the intersection on a collision course at a 90-degree angle. A study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated that connected-vehicle technology could help prevent up to 81% of crashes that don't involve an impaired driver.
In theory, this is how V2V would be development and implemented:
- One issue relates to standards for communication. A consortium of automakers has agreed to a set of standards, including a decision to use a souped-up form of WiFi (5.9 gigahertz) called DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communication) for safety functions.
- The DSRC system creates a 360-degree, 300-meter circle of connection around a car.
- V2V is seen as taking a decade to implement via factory installed equipment. Other options might involve embedded V2V in existing portable GPS receivers.
- Toyota thinks they have another 1.5 years of V2V development.
- Ford is currently testing V2V. One key test is 100% reliability.
- BMU is taking V2V to another level. The BMU system ties V2V to automatic braking.
Both V2V and V2I have plenty of social, legal, and technological hurdles. The world is moving forward with this type of technology - - Japan, South Korea, and several other countries are moving ahead with plans to invest billions in intelligent transportation systems.
Communication has changed the world - - except between vehicles. We basically still communicate as if we drive Model Ts - - signals, facial expressions, and middle fingers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.