Over the next decade, Ryan plans to spend about 16 percent less than the White House on “income security” programs for the poor — that’s everything from food stamps to housing assistance to the earned-income tax credit. (Ryan’s budget would authorize $4.8 trillion between 2013 and 2022; the White House’s would spend $5.7 trillion.) Compared with Obama, Ryan would spend 25 percent less on transportation. He’d spend 6 percent less on “General science, space, and basic technology.” And, compared with the White House’s proposal, he’d shell out 33 percent less for “Education, training, employment, and social services.”
A variety of think tanks and
analysts have pegged the cost of repairing and upgrading our
transportation networks at somewhere between $200 billion and $262 billion per
year over the next decade. The White House’s budget envisions spending an
average of about $104 billion per year over that time. Ryan’s budget, meanwhile,
allocates $78 billion per year. In his summary,
Ryan claims he can meet the country’s needs by cutting back on “imprudent,
irresponsible, and downright wasteful spending,” though it’s not clear what
waste Ryan has in mind, much less whether it would make up the gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.